{"id":48058,"date":"2018-11-30T13:00:48","date_gmt":"2018-11-30T18:00:48","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/25yearslatersite.com\/?p=48058"},"modified":"2023-09-09T21:20:58","modified_gmt":"2023-09-10T01:20:58","slug":"twin-peaks-the-final-dossier-a-deep-dive-review-and-analysis-part-4","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/25yearslatersite.com\/2018\/11\/30\/twin-peaks-the-final-dossier-a-deep-dive-review-and-analysis-part-4\/","title":{"rendered":"Twin Peaks: The Final Dossier- A Deep Dive Review and Analysis (Part 4)"},"content":{"rendered":"

\u2018Twin Peaks: The Final Dossier- A Deep Dive Review and Analysis (Part 4)\u2019\u00a0<\/em>is now available on Audio, read by author John Bernardy, exclusively for our Patreon supporters. For just $3 a month you will have access to our full library of Audio content, plus three new uploads every week. To sign up visit our Patreon page: https:\/\/www.patreon.com\/25YL<\/span><\/a><\/em><\/p>\n


\n

In Part 3<\/a> of this Final Dossier<\/em> <\/a>Deep Dive series, I brought up the section from Pages 131 to the end the book where Tamara Preston experiences a reality where Dale Cooper travelled back in time to 1989 and \u201csaved\u201d Laura Palmer from the immediate events that resulted in her death. I suggest this is a hazy conclusion, and also not necessarily true. I say this:<\/p>\n

And in Part 4 of this Deep Dive, I will make a case for where exactly the (likely incorrect\/malleable) details of The Final Dossier\u2019s<\/em> plot fits within a cycle from Denial to Acceptance.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

And here we are at Part 4.<\/p>\n

Does only Twin Peaks believe Laura Palmer is a missing person rather than a murder victim? The book never clarifies. Only that Preston\u2019s head feels less messed with as her plane gets further away from Twin Peaks. I refuse to believe that Laura\u2019s timeline removal is anything more than a veil over the actual events of reality.<\/p>\n

You can take the words of this book at face value if you’d like, but that\u2019ll lead you to believe that the association Tamara made about utukku is absolutely spot-on, and that Windom Earle is the one who put the birthday cake into Leo\u2019s hair. Much in the way Tamara Preston gets to the emotional truth of things rather than the factual account, you can believe for 100% that we are supposed to know Sarah and Leland Palmer were both monsters, but I believe the utukku section specifically is the unofficial version to remember, and that the official version is much less specifically plot. It’s like how every drop of UFO lore is quite specifically laid out in The Secret History of Twin Peaks<\/em><\/a> but is more likely explaining an aspect of what we can understand of the lodge denizens.<\/p>\n

The truth of this book is in the philosophy, not the details. \u00a0It\u2019s about looking into the dark and through it until you find the truth. If you get caught up in the window dressing of the surface words, you\u2019ll get close, but I think we\u2019re supposed to come to our own conclusions, and like the rest of Twin Peaks<\/em>, work with what resonates and causes the shakeups in ourselves until we recognize the reality of our present and deal with the trauma within ourselves.<\/p>\n

Only then do we know what we\u2019re fighting against and we\u2019re never supposed to give up. That part Tamara gets right. As far as how false \u201ctruths\u201d being introduced in Final Dossier<\/em>, I believe there are three kinds of factors in play:<\/p>\n