Book Review – Twin Peaks: The Final Dossier

It doesn’t seem possible, but a little over one year ago (has it been a year already?) we were waiting with bated breath for the release of the first piece of substantially new Twin Peaks material in a quarter century (The Missing Pieces notwithstanding—those scenes were scripted and filmed and their existence known about for almost all of those intervening years.) Back then, we were still awaiting the first details of The Return; now, we’re two months out from the end of the series, and in a decidedly different place as a fan community.

Last October’s The Secret History of Twin Peaks (TSHoTP) was a nearly 400-page behemoth filled with more questions than answers, and while it thrilled a significant subset of the Twin Peaks fan base (25YL’s very own John Bernardy chief among them), it seems to have frustrated just as many with its meandering Doug Milford plot line, aliens and the occult, and significant inconsistencies to several prominent Twin Peaks citizens’ back stories. It also didn’t even whisper against the most pressing questions we all had about the people whose lives we had left so unceremoniously back in 1991. What happened to Norma and Ed and Nadine? What about in the aftermath of the bank explosion or with Ben Horne and Will Hayward? How is Annie?!

Final DossierToday’s release of Twin Peaks: The Final Dossier has the potential to satisfy even the most disillusioned Twin Peaks fan left hardened by TSHoTP or the warbling end of the third season. The Final Dossier seems to be what most people expected from TSHoTP before it was released (back when it was tentatively known as The Secret Lives Of Twin Peaks.) It is a little over half the length of its predecessor and attempts to chart a throughline narrative for the intervening twenty-five years (and a wee bit beyond…), chronicling the goings-on in the lives of the principals we’d come to know and love. It feels, to put it in the words of my colleague Rob E. King, “like it brings the soap opera back, like I’m reading trashy town gossip columns.” I couldn’t agree more and, personally speaking, I’m 100% here for it.

That said, those among us only interested in definitive closure to the events shown to us in this summer’s limited series event will be largely disappointed by The Final Dossier. This is not a book that wants to tie everything up with a neat little bow (something for which yours truly is very grateful, but which will annoy many other discerning readers nonetheless.) Nor will you be happy if you wanted the mystery deepened considerably. The Final Dossier sits neatly in between a number of extremes, not satisfied to be wholly any one thing and thus managing to be a lot of everything in the process: at times a traditional novel and at others a found-document, a comedy and a thriller, supernatural and earth-bound, an ending and a beginning. The Final Dossier excels at balancing the need we have to uncover the missing pieces while still keeping the mystery alive.

The plot progresses neatly and linearly from the finale of the series through the various character histories until we arrive at the present day (September 6, 2017 to be precise.) There aren’t many twists (but the ones that are revealed are doozies!) and the stories within interlock together in such a way that the overarching frame narrative — Tamara Preston’s task of putting together a “final dossier” on the people of Twin Peaks to satisfy her “Chief” Gordon Cole’s curiosity for the town he grew to love so much — builds to a satisfying and startling conclusion that absolutely leaves the door open for more should Lynch/Frost choose to venture down that path, but which also has a kind of wistful “end” should this be the last we get in the world of Twin Peaks.

We do hear from a few key players, in their “own words”, through collected reports and letters as well as the remembrances of people who relayed the information to Tammy in the course of her investigation. Mostly, though, this is the Tamara Preston show, and while she is less sassy that she was in TSHoTP — no snide side-remarks and footnotes in this puppy — she is still a lovely guide through this world. It’s delightful to hear the entire thing voiced by Annie Wersching on the audiobook, which clocks in at just under 3 hours in length for those of you who are curious. If there’s a reason why Chrysta Bell didn’t voice Tammy in the book, I haven’t heard it, but all the same I’m glad that Wersching loaned her talents out once again; I really like her.

While a far cry from the epistolary beauty of TSHoTP — there are far fewer found documents included, as the book takes the form of a compilation of separate files detailing the various families and individuals Tammy was tasked with reporting on, and so the words are all hers with few exceptions (as mentioned above) — in my opinion The Final Dossier is a wonderful way to say farewell to Twin Peaks and an equally wonderful way to invite more if that’s what the creators so choose. Do you want more Twin Peaks? It’s there for you to imagine. Do you hope for this to be the end? That’s equally valid, and supported by the text. Maybe it’s not the most satisfying of conclusions, but it’s a conclusion, make of it what you will.

Of course the book won’t completely satisfy everyone; it may even invite criticism of some kind or another from many, though I hope it’s not of the same kind that befell TSHoTP last year. But, in my opinion, Mark Frost has scored a big win here, expanding the universe and playing within it in the way that only novelists of his caliber can. This is where Frost truly shines — he has a gift for this writing thing, and is quite clearly enjoying himself when he does it (as the sections on Dr. Jacoby and Jerry Horne definitely attest.) He also spins quite a yarn. I’ve never been comfortable with the idea of there being a hard and fast Twin Peaks “canon” (neither, it seems, are its creators…) and the shifting realities of TSHoTP and what’s happening in The Return further embolden me to reject any notion of canonicity going forward, but it is fascinating to see how Frost imagined these characters living their lives. I’d love to know how much of this existed in conversations between Frost and Lynch but never made it to screen, for one reason or another, and how much of it was purely his own invention. Lynch famously said that TSHoTP was Mark’s version of events; does David have a version? Can each of us have a version too?

One thing is for certain, and I’ll let our dearly departed Margaret Lanterman say it because she says it best: “The answers to all our questions are in the wind and the trees, the rocks and the water.” I supposed this means it’s time for those of us who feel called to do so to venture off on our own Dr. Amp-approved ‘Walking in Nature Program’ walkabout, tuning in through the static at the answers that lie waiting.


I’ll be tackling this in more detail in a spoiler-full discussion this Saturday in my Notes from the Bookhouse column. Come back and check it out, as well as the other fantastic articles my colleagues will be putting out in the coming weeks. 

Many thanks to Stewart Gardiner for supplying me with photos of the book while I waited for my hardcopy to arrive.

Featured photo credit: Eileen G. Mykkels

6 Replies to “Book Review – Twin Peaks: The Final Dossier”

  1. Book is great once again was plagued by inconsistent dates, Annie would have been 17 when she met Dale according to the book, and Windom Earle would not have made it to Twin Peaks Until 95 if it took him 10 years to escape, little things like this kept throwing me out of the narrative

    Like

  2. Thanks yall, I very much enjoy your site. Please keep up the good work. Just finished the TPTFD audiobook. Stunned and thrilled, and maybe even slightly sad, being at the end of the line here. Having a laugh thinking about all the theorizers out there (including myself!) writhing like the Thing touched by a drop of mercury with the realizations contained therein — especially re Annie Blackburn being *real* and not a lodge entity, Philip Jefferies and the spacetime-gallavanting Doppelcoop, and especially Sarah (Judith!) Palmer getting parasitically mouth-boarded by the little Jouday utuku frogmoth. Wonderful — and Strange! Now that I’m back on the West coast I hope to trek up to the next TPF! Thanks again.

    Like

    1. Aces, Josh! I have more to say about Annie—her timeline in the book still doesn’t match up at all, so I’m still not convinced something isn’t up with her! But we’ll see…🤔😆

      Like

      1. Cheers! So…with the timelines — I know they don’t always match up. But why should we think they have to? It’s a bit stifling on the whole of the experience IMO. And I think ultimately when we are dealing with ripples and flex in the spacetime continuum, as we clearly are, the writers should get some slack when it comes to having all the dates match up.

        Who’s to say that the dates don’t change in response to the interplay of events? Maybe it’s just that much more friction-inducing when one is trying to ‘prove’ their own particular theory. But as some have said, ‘Jouday’ translates to ‘to explain’ in Chinese — but to be my own contrarian I would say the inflections and subtleties of the Chinese language lead me to believe that that translation is a bit of a reach.

        Furthermore, anyone who has made it into or out of either of the lodges willingly/intentionally (Coop/Doppelcoop, Briggs, Earle), have shown by their actions and behaviors that the passing of and through spacetime takes on new forms and characteristics that defy typical explanation.

        I say some warble is par for the course — the ST continuum itself defies ‘normal’ perceptual ‘continuity’!

        Ahh me, abuser of quotes :^]

        I will re-read your Annie post (that was yours, yeah?)… I do love what someone said about her name… Blackburn…loveit

        Like

      2. That’s exactly it! The timelines aren’t going to match up if the Lodges are involved, and the fact that they don’t is “proof” that the timeline has been altered. My question is why are things that happened *before* Cooper’s arrival in Twin Peaks different as well as things that happened *after*? It makes me wonder about the nature of spacetime…but that’s a whole ‘nother subject… 😉

        Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s